There are many reasons for getting a PhD:
career, academic interest, want to challenge your own learning, curiosity, specific
areas which you want to investigate, escaping the feeling of stagnation,
wanting to become top notch in your business or field of expertise, or being
the first in your family to attain a doctoral degree. It ranges from pragmatic,
to personal, to materializing hopes for the future. I wanted to start a PhD
because I felt I had reached a limit and by earning a PhD I would be able to
open up new opportunities. Whether or not that will work remains to be seen,
but in the meantime I am doing it, taking charge of my own life (always a good
thing in my opinion). What I share is based on personal ideas, so feel free to add what helped/s you along the way.
First hurdle: starting a Phd. In order to
start, you need to write a proposal, and in order to write a proposal, you need
to find some area of interest. You will have to be working on that subject
for at least 3 years. So it is crucial to understand what makes you tick:
- Money
- Tech development (e.g. building apps, cloud)
- Internal human development (e.g. cognitive science, neuroscience)
- Human Computer Interaction (e.g. user interface, android tech embedding)
- Emerging trends and innovations (e.g. big data,
- Reaching new learners
- Empowering learners/regions
- Anything will do as long as you stay true to what you want to excel in
Research methodologies are (very roughly here to stay brief) divided into qualitative and quantitative methods. The qualitative methods start from a hypothesis, the quantitative methods start from a research question that can look for meaning, or explore something (more of an assumption). Both methods can be mixed, but if you have a distinct preference for either numbers or words, you might want to stick to that preference and choose or propose a methodology range that fits your best capacities: quantitative for number liking people, qualitative for interpretative types of researchers, or both for those ... who like both. Currently the research trend is to mix both quantitative and qualitative, but it is always useful to work with your strengths in-spite of trends.
What if you just do not know what it is you
like? Look closer to home:
Who do you look up to? What do these people
do? What field of expertise are they in?
Which stories appeal to you? (Steve Jobs, Marie
Curie, Kofi Annan, Ada Lovelace, …)
For me, I looked up to mobile learning
people and practitioners working in developing regions making a difference
through participative projects. And as I come from a long line of clergymen of
all kinds, I need to have the idea of meaningfulness linked to whatever I do
(which is luckily a subjective idea).
Another useful thought to find your topic
of interest is to think where would you like to work in the future? Non-profit,
corporate, academic? Maybe there is a bridge possible between your PhD work and
where you want to go (start-up, astrophysics)
Next step – get your proposal written
Just like a PhD the proposal must reflect
your thinking, or the process of your thinking. A good narrative indicating the
why, who, where and how always works (when might be tough to integrate in a
proposal).
Screen your topic for current research
challenges (and again make sure they interest you, intrinsic motivation is
important). If you can show that other
researchers point to your topic as a scientific need, it sure helps getting
your proposal accepted.
References, when writing a proposal it is
also important to mention just a few, but KEY researchers in your area linked
to the topic you want to cover in your proposal. And it cannot hurt to add experts
in that topic related to the university you want to apply to.
A good proposal offers insight to the
potential challenges or the undiscovered research frontier you have found, research questions you might want to
cover, expertise you might have or references that you found useful and a
rational on how you imagine you will look for answers to your proposed research
question. (and do not be put off by the search for a ‘correct’ research
question, once you start your PhD your supervisors will help in really focusing
on a subject and digging in deeper so you can come up with the best research
question).
You might want to touch some general methodologies
you had in mind. If you do not have any idea of what methodologies are out
there (which was the case when I started to look for PhD options), then look at
what your peer researchers did in the area you want to cover. Did they use
quantitative approaches, qualitative methods, mixed methods… you must not get
bogged down in the details of a methodology, but getting an idea of what would
fit your style sure helps. For instance,
within qualitative research you might want to explore critical research,
or with qualitative research you might want to screen (or ask other researchers)
for current trends and see if one of those feels like an option. Again, during
your PhD study you will learn A LOT as you go through the motions, so again, do
not worry if you feel you do not (yet) know what it is all about. But your
proposal should show that you are willing to find out, that you have an
investigative mind, that you are willing and able to share your thinking
process with others to prove you have it in you to become an autonomous
researcher.
Ask your network for ideas and reasons
And something which helped me a lot: roam your network to see what your peers do, hear where they think possible research exists and why. Having shared the above, I must admit I did not follow all these steps. Which is probably why I am now struggling to connect my pilot study outcomes with the goal of my main study. It feels as though the research does not align completely with what does make me tick. But... still working on it, for I do feel that personal motivation and drive make the Phd journey a bit easier.
No comments:
Post a Comment